L1 Visa Renewal Challenges

The L1 visa is one of the most popular vehicles bysuch as administration, marketing, public relations, and
which the owners of foreign businesses can obtainhuman resource management.
permanent status in the United States by expandingThe USCIS is mindful that such non-qualifying duties
operations to the United States. The process is carriedare required to get the new operation off the ground.
out in three steps:However, the applicable regulations grant a company
First, the initial L1 visa is issued for a period of one yearonly one year to accomplish this. By the time the
to set up operations of the new U.S. branch;renewal petition must be filed, these non-managerial
Second, the L1 visa must be renewed based (in part)and non-executive duties must have been transferred
on the first-year record of the U.S. branch;to locally employed personnel, working in actual
Third, once renewed, for an additional 2 years, the L1physical offices. The size of the staff is not important;
visa holder may apply for permanent residency withonly that it be adequate to cover the afore-mentioned
the support of the U.S. branch.essential functions.
It would not be an exaggeration to state that theIn a typical case, this issue comes to light when the
USCIS often approves the initial L1 visa on a vision --company or its lawyer receives a request for
supported by a well drafted business plan and aadditional evidence (an "RFE") from the USCIS. The
convincing amount of money in the bank. However, ifRFE usually requests a very detailed accounting of the
getting ones foot in the door seems easy enough,beneficiary's duties, a detailed organizational chart
renewal of the visa frequently turns out to be ashowing the names of all individuals employed by the
nightmare for the applicant who -- more often than notU.S. company, as well as a detailed accounting of their
-- has uprooted hearth and home with the intention ofduties, and payroll and tax records proving the locally
permanently relocating to the United States.employed employees.
Our firm has reviewed the decisions in all casesUpon receipt of the RFE, some companies try to
published in 2005 by the Administrative Appeals Unit ofremedy the lack of essential personnel by quickly
the Department of Justice in which the USCIS deniedengaging a few people solely to satisfy the RFE, or
a petition for L1A visa renewal. In 98% of these casesthey attempt to justify the use off-shore personnel to
the reasons for the denial were virtually identical:cover these functions. A review of the published
1. The petitioner did not establish that the beneficiarydenials, however, reveals that such quick-fix attempts
will be employed in a primarily managerial or executiveare a reason, in and of themselves, for the denial. Such
capacity;quick-fixes simply serve to demonstrate that the new
2. The petitioner did not employ adequate or sufficientcompany has not reached the level of development
personnel.required at the one-year mark. In short, a petitioner that
3. The petitioner did not establish physical offices;finds itself at the receiving end of an RFE questioning
The biggest mistake most applicants and/or theirwhether the beneficiary will be employed in a primarily
immigration lawyers make is to assume that the samemanagerial or executive capacity should seriously
duties that supported the initial visa petition will beconsider other visa options.
sufficient to support the renewal. This assumption isIn our opinion, the wisest course is to plan a renewal
fatal to a renewal case. This is because the duties anstrategy as part of your initial case preparation. Aside
L1A beneficiary must undertake in the first year tofrom being a sound business practice, this course of
set-up operations must include - by necessity -action will go quite far to avoid any unpleasant and
non-managerial and non-executive essential functionspotentially catastrophic surprises in the future.