The Relevance of Doha Round to Developing Countries

The Doha Development Round (DDR) is a negotiationthe negotiating table. President George W. Bush
between members of the World Trade Organizationagreed that the talks were important and expressed
(WTO) that aims to lower international barriers andthe desire to have the DDR negotiations completed
encourage global trade. Through cooperation andbefore the end of his term.
negotiation the WTO believes that open trade willAt the end of 2008, the U.S., China, and India again sat
provide worldwide economic growth.down to try and hammer out their differences.
Although the negotiations began in 2001 and wereAlthough all of the parties agreed this meeting was
supposed to conclude in 2005, the talks have stallednecessary to establish the standards of compromise
many times, most recently in 2008. While mostfor the DDR, the negotiations proved fruitless.
developing countries like India, Brazil, China and SouthSince the stalemate, Brazilian President Lula has
America tout the benefits of open trade there havepersonally called several countries leaders in an effort
been many contentious battles between theseto restart the negotiations. In January of this year,
developing countries and the major economic forcesPresident Silva became very outspoken about the
like the United States and Japan.United States role in the breakdown of the
In recent months, Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula danegotiations.
Silva has asked United States President BarackCriticizing the political will of the U.S. Congress, Lula
Obama to make completing the world trade talks aclaimed a deal on the Doha could have been reached
priority.but the U.S. had no desire to reach a consensus. Lula
In 2008, talks stalled over agricultural import rules. Afurther emphasized how important the agreement is to
disagreement erupted between the United States andpoor developing nations whose main source of income
India regarding the special safeguard mechanism and ais agriculture. However, President Obama has not been
special tariff on certain agricultural goods. The specialvery enthusiastic about certain provisions of Doha and
mechanism was designed to protect small farmers bywhat he feels amounts to the undervaluation of US
allowing countries to impose a special tariff during anworkers.
import surge.Meanwhile, President Lula has responded by saying
The United States (U.S.) and the European Union (EU)that an agreement on the Doha is needed to provide
felt that the procedure for invoking the mechanismstability to the current world economy. In fact, Lula
was too lax. India and China refused to budgeominously predicts that failure to enact the global trade
proclaiming that they needed to protect the livelihoodagreement will result in chaos and confusion.
of their citizens. The U.S. and EU proclaimed that ChinaThe actual benefits of the DDR have been hotly
and India had adopted an uncompromising position.debated and purely speculative. Clearly most of the
Sadly, both sides refused to compromise and Indiadeveloping countries believe that the trade facilitation
claimed that their position was supported by more thanwill grow their struggling economies and better the lives
one hundred countries. Surprisingly, Brazil, one of theof their citizens.
most vocal developing countries, diverged from IndiaIn 2002, the University of Michigan completed a study
on this point.in international economics. According to the findings of
The situation was exasperated by finger pointing andthe study, if the DDR agreement passed and
name calling with India publicly accusing the U.S. ofsucceeded in reducing trade barriers by thirty-three
harming the poor. For its part, the U.S. openly accusedpercent, global welfare would experience a several
India and China of causing the standoff. In its defense,billion dollar increase.
prior to the stalemate, the U.S. did agree to capping itsWorld Economist Kym Anderson completed a 2008
subsidies and increasing the amount of work visas itstudy where she theorized the success of DDR would
would issue every year.result in a three thousand billion dollar increase in global
After the negotiations crumbled, Jose Augusto deincome. Other economists shun these astronomical
Castro, vice president of Brazils Foreign Tradenumbers and concede that success of the DDR
Association announced that protectionism hadwould increase the global income, but they warn that it
triumphed. Brazil claimed that because it hadis too early to postulate exact figures.
abandoned many bilateral deals in favor of theAs the debate about its strengths and weaknesses
multilateral Doha, it was now adversely affected bycontinues to rage, the future of the DDR remains
the demise of the treaties.tenuous. Even if a compromise was made that
However, some Brazilian leaders promised that Brazilpleased the current U.S. President, the Doha cannot
would forge its way into other open markets with orbecome law until it has been ratified by the U.S.
without the Doha agreement. Other Brazilian leadersCongress.
threatened litigation against the U.S., saying that the U.S.Critics maintain that the DDR may not be the best plan
abused its subsidies to the detriment of Brazil.for the American economy but Congress will face
After the July 30th impasse, Brazilians Foreign Ministerinternational political pressure from developing nations
Celso Amorim joined forces with Susan Schwab, alike Brazil to pass the trade pact.
U.S. trade representative, to bring the parties back to